Riskier borrowers under inflation pressure frozen out of US car loans (FT)

alex2017

New member
https://www.ft.com/content/71e3b1f2-57a7-4cc0-89f1-ba814d89014a

Lenders concentrate on consumers with better credit and delinquencies rise in subprime tier

Lenders are extending fewer loans to the car buyers with the riskiest profiles, a sign that they are bracing for an economic slowdown that could test people’s ability to pay their debts.

The pullback in credit to so-called subprime borrowers comes as used-car prices remain high and record petrol prices increase the cost of driving a car.

Interest rates are rising as the Federal Reserve works to contain inflation.

“A whole swath of consumers are just not going to be able to get cars,” said Jennifer Thomas, a portfolio manager at Loomis Sayles.

Instead, lenders are concentrating on consumers with better credit scores, a trend that can be seen in pools of auto loans that are used to back issuance of new debt through so-called asset backed securities.

Global Lending Services has cut the number of loans to borrowers without a credit score to 5.6 per cent of its latest deal this month, down from closer to 8 per cent in its deal sold at the same time last year, according to data from S&P Global.

The South Carolina-based lender also cut the percentage of loans to other borrowers in the lower tier of subprime credit, while it boosted the number of loans to borrowers with a credit score of more than 600. Subprime is defined differently by various data providers, but it is commonly understood as a Fico credit score of less than 620.

The subprime lending arm at Santander bank has also boosted lending to borrowers with a credit score of 601 and above. It reduced the number of loans to borrowers who lack a credit score to less than 8 per cent in its latest deal this year, from more than 12 per cent for deals at the start of 2020 and the end of 2019, according to S&P.

At General Motors-owned AmeriCredit, more than 13 per cent of the loans in its deal this month were to borrowers with a Fico score of 660 or higher, up from less than 3 per cent last year. Amy Martin, head of auto ABS research at rating agency S&P Global, said that there has been a similar trend across other subprime auto ABS issuers, as rising interest rates and soaring inflation are expected to put increasing pressure on consumers’ finances.

“A number of issuers have told us that they are trying to be more conservative, eliminating the lowest quality buckets given that they are concerned about inflationary pressures on their customer base,” Martin said.

Used car and truck prices are outpacing inflation in the US, rising 16.1 per cent year over year to May, the government reported last week. Over the past year, the average used car loan amount surged by nearly $4,000 for deep subprime borrowers, according to Experian, with the average monthly payment rising by $78 to $425.

Interest rates on loans in recent subprime ABS deals were typically around 20 per cent. “A lot of issuers have just cut off the bottom end of consumers, saying they can’t afford these cars,” said Thomas of Loomis Sayles.

For outstanding loans, some borrowers are beginning to struggle to make debt payments. While overall delinquencies remain in line with seasonal trends, the number of subprime write-offs and borrowers more than 60 days past due on their payments has risen to a new record this year, according to data from Equifax.
 
@djpearson I think the companies that operate in this space know that there aren't many alternatives. They are able to charge such high interest rates because you have no where else to go. It's wrong that companies are able to take advantage of people who need help the most.
 
@marir I agree that if someone can't pay back the loan, you shouldn't give them the loan. But at what point does the cost of the loan make it even likelier to default?

For example, let's look at 2 hypothetical loans. Both for a $20k car, 10% down and 84 month period. 1 loan is for 5% interest which means payments are $254.41/month. The other option is a 26% loan as @djpearson has mentioned. The same loan now costs $467.18/month.

The person that can get a 5% interest loan has better credit and can probably afford more while for @djpearson's friend, the extra $213 is probably a lot larger portion of his/her income. If the loan interest was lower, wouldn't it make it less likely for them to default?

There is definitely a problem of adverse selection, but I don't think we can generalise people. There are people that would be able to pay back their loans IF they were given more reasonable terms.
 
@alex2017 I hate that those that NEED the lower interest rates get the highest ones.

I mean, I get that risk is the deciding factor but, as you just outlined, this seems to be a chicken and egg thing: the higher the %, the higher the likelihood of defaulting.

I got a car refinance loan, last year, for .99%. I make $40k/yr.

They make $25k/yr and get the 26.44%.

Smh.
 
@djpearson Exactly. Is this a fact of life like physics? Or is this something that can be changed? Do these people who NEED lower interest rates get the highest because really they are high risk, or do these higher interest rates MAKE them higher risk?

Because auto loan companies know that they can charge you this, they will.

How can we fix this? How do we make it better?
 
@alex2017 a loan is an investment - if the issuer doesn't make a certain percentage it isn't worth the risk.

the only way I can see things getting "fixed" is to stop paying on credit/loans in the first place. buy everything with cash. if you can't afford it outright, don't buy it.
 
@alex2017 One thing that I think your hypothetical misses is whether or not that subprime borrower is actually getting a 20k vehicle. I think the math changes a lot when you’re borrowing 10k @ 26% (which comes out to $260/mo). You’re still overpaying massively for the vehicle, but the payment suddenly makes (some) sense. I’d argue that if you’re at the point where you can only qualify for a sub-prime loan that you shouldn’t even be looking at a 20k car - which isn’t exactly an uncommon sentiment either.
 
It seems like getting financing for an auto loan is going to get harder for borrowers who have FICO score below 620. While there are lenders that specialise in these market segments, predatory lending practices and business models mean borrowers in this community will face an even tougher time ahead.

Does this have to be this way? Lenders will say that customers in this market segment represent riskier credit and therefore higher delinquencies and defaults mean loans need to be expensive to make up for it. However, others would argue that the high cost of the loan actually makes it likelier that the borrower defaults.

It seems like it's more profitable to exploit your customers than to provide sustainable, responsible, reasonable financing.

There must be a better way to serve these customers reasonably and still be profitable.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top