@vall3y Epigenetics is quite interesting from that standpoint. A lot of our ancestors lived through some really tough times, uprooted and immigrated to a new world, often times without much family, and then raised their own family in this new world. The distance from cultural norma and community would have no doubt had an effect on their children. Those children then grow into adults and raise their kids similarly, often passing down the same stresses.
We are all just trying to do our best given the circumstances of our history, but we are failing as a society to get back to where we once thrived as a community. This is why we need more government support to keep kids at home and allow parents to parent. We’d all be better off for it. Given that the majority of ED admissions in Australia are due to chronic disease, which has been theorised to be correlating with childhood trauma with pretty concrete data (ACE studies), there is little doubt that investing in child rearing policies will have a knock on effect for chronic disease burden later in life, freeing up the public health system and keeping people working longer. It’s insane that we don’t focus more on this issue from a political standpoint.
This would certainly help to kerb some of the on-flow of negative epigenetic traits. We need to get away from plugging holes in the system, be proactive, and start addressing child rearing policy.