Valuation Gap between Indian subsidiaries of MNC vis-a-vis Holding company and their emerging markets counterparts

cn17

New member
Multinational Corporations(MNC’s) have been immense wealth creators for shareholders over the past couple of decades. Focus on R&D, capital allocation and execution and more importantly a very strong corporate governance has resulted in MNC’s getting very high valuations. So how do the parent companies fare vis-a-vis their Indian subsidaries ?

Lets start with comparing some of the valuations across the years of some major MNC’s with their holding companies and with other emerging market subsidaries of those holding companies

Hindustan Unilever v/s Unilever PLC

The parent company Unilever PLC has a market cap of 122.41 billion GBP translating to around 11,87,377 crores. The company trades at around a 20.42 PE and a 2.63 market cap to sales ratio and the company has a return to equity of around 40 percent. The company has given a 6.1% CAGR return over the past 10 years in GBP and a return of 9.6% in INR. Unilever PLC holds a 47.43 % stake but along with other subsidiaries the total promoter holding is 61.90 % up from 52.01 percent. Unilever group companies hold shares worth of HUL of current value of 3,04,657 crores or around 25.65 % of the entire business up from around 37,376 crores or 10.36 % of the entire business.

Hindustan Unilever has a market cap of 4,92,032 crores. The stock trades at a PE of 67.6 and a market cap to sales ratio of around 11.8 and the company has a return on equity of around 85.7 percent. The company has given around a 20 percent CAGR return over the previous 10 years. Hindustan Unilever’s market cap is around 41.4 % of the parent companies market cap up from 20.8 % in 2010.

Comparing HUL’s valuation metrics with other emerging market subsidaries of Unilever PLC –

Indonesia is the closest emerging market subsidary which is listed, I have also added valuation of Pakistan subsidary for a reference point.

HUL v/s PT Unilever Indonesia TBK v/s Unilever Pakistan Foods Limited

PE ratio – 67.7 / 42.6 / 23.43

Return on Equity – 85.7% / 109.5% / 163.6%

Market Cap to Sales – 11.8 / 6.53 / 5.28

Hindustan Unilever’s valuation metrics are much higher than any of the comparables even when comparing it with other Emerging Markets group companies. However, the company does have a solid track record of top and bottomline growth for a rather long time. I would be skeptical for current valuations holding on for the next decade but that could be a personal bias since I don’t believe the stock to trade at current valuations in the future.

Simulating last decadal returns for the next 10 years would mean that HUL and Unilever PLC will both have a market cap of HUL and Unilever PLC of around 30,00,000 crores by 2030 an incredibly unlikely scenario. One may take this information whatever way you can, but if one has firm convictions it is very likely that Unilever PLC should grow much higher than its 10 year historically average, if HUL can deliver some returns. However base case scenario I believe is going to be that HUL has no room for valuation expansion with some room for valuation de rating, returns of HUL will come directly from its operating top and bottom line expansion.

Maruti Suzuki v/s Suzuki Corporation

The parent company Suzuki Corporation has a market cap of 2.43 trillion JPY translating to around 1,77,550 crores. The company trades at around a 24.79 PE and a 0.73 market cap to sales ratio and the company has a return to equity of around 10.6%. The company has given a 8.8% CAGR return over the past 10 years in JPY and 11.5% CAGR return in INR. Suzuki Corporation holds a 56.37% stake in Maruti Suzuki up from 54.21% 10 years ago. Suzuki Corporation holds shares worth 117264 crores or around 66.24% of the entire business up from around 25397 crores or 47.5% of the entire business.

Maruti Suzuki has a market cap of 2,08,665 crores. The stock trades at a PE of 52.5 and a market cap to sales ratio of around 3.38 and the company has a return on equity of around 6.79%. The company has given around a 17% CAGR return over the previous 10 years. Maruti Suzuki’s market cap is around 120% of the parent companies market cap up from 87.6% in 2010.

I could not find any data for other listed subsidaries except the Pakistan subsdiary – Pakistan Suzuki Motor Company Limited which is a heavy loss making company and I do not believe the comparables to be comparable.

While valuation metrics are a bit haywire due to covid impact and cyclical nature of the business, Suzuki Corporation seems to be a better value buy since the value of the parent company somehow is lower than its Indian subsidiary. Basically what it means is that for 1,77,550 crores you get the Indian subsidiary worth around 1,17,264 crores and for the balance net 60,286 crores you get 33 additional production facilities in 22 countries, the technical know-how and presence in 192 countries. I believe Suzuki Corporation should replicate and surpass how Maruti Suzuki performs. An additional trigger could be a similar execution of utter dominance by Maruti Suzuki in the consumer vehicle in any of the countries where Suzuki Corporation operates in.

Nestle India v/s Nestle S.A

The parent company Nestle S.A. has a market cap of 305.56 billion CHF translating to around 24,95,203 crores. The company trades at around a 22.65 PE and a 3.30 market cap to sales ratio and the company has a return to equity of around 28.7%. The company has given a 6.7% CAGR return over the past 10 years in CHF Terms, and 13.52% in INR terms. Nestle SA directly holds a 34.28 % stake in Nestle India and indirectly holds a 62.76%. Nestle S.A. directly holds shares worth 55,257 crores or around 2.21% of the entire business up from around 11,290 crores or 1.61% of the entire business.

Nestle India has a market cap of 1,61,994 crores. The stock trades at a PE of 77.8, a market cap to sales ratio of around 12.3 and the company has a return on equity of around 70.3%. The company has given around a 16% CAGR return over the last 10 years. Nestle India’s market cap is around 6.49% of the parent companies market cap up from 4.69% in 2010.

Comparing Nestle India valuation metrics with other emerging market subsidaries of Nestle S.A.-

Nestle India v/s Nestle Malaysia v/s Nestle Nigeria PLC

PE ratio – 77.8 / 59.34 / 28.19

Return on Equity – 70.3% / 85.4% / 83%

Market Cap to Sales – 12.3 / 5.64 / 3.74

Nestle S.A. is the largest food company in the world, Nestle India is just a very tiny part of the parent corporation. While both companies have given terrific returns over the last 10 years in INR terms it needs to be seen whether the same performance can be replicated over the next 10 years because of a much higher base. The same common theme of Indian subsidiaries having the highest multiples is a bit concerning, though Nestle India has grown at a solid rate but the price to earning multiples look stretched even by Nestle India standards, any return is more likely to come from top and bottomline expansion rather than a PE expansion.
 
@cn17 I’m just being the stupid guy here.. but wouldn’t you have come to the same conclusion had you made this same analysis 10 years ago?

Also, with HUL and Nestle, I think they’ll grow through acquisitions.
 
@alsu Not really. When you look at how integral the Indian units have been to incase of Suzuki and Unilever , it is not possible for both of them to grow at their historical growth rates. Growing through acquisitions is going to be very tough, they may grow but it is not going to have a big impact due to much a larger base. Even HUL's recent acquisition was a shareswap deal which dropped the promoter shareholding by more than 4-5 percent, they do not have enough cash to acquire larger assets, it is more likely to be a merger. They can very much grow top and bottomline at around 10-12 percent CAGR over the next 10 years, but I do not expect the topline and bottomline growth to translate into share price performance. It is just my opinion though, I have been wrong before and I will be wrong in the future.
 
@cn17 You've obviously done the quantitative analysis, but yeah Indian equities are "premium emerging economy". Maybe it's a political/fiscal stability premium, or maybe it's just that we use English everywhere so reports/analyses etc. are a lot more accessible, or maybe it's just a halo or something, but the premium has existed for a while now.
 
@enarvaez3096 I agree. The premium has existed for a while now and there is a good probability I have missed something that will happen in the future. But just by going as per historical data, I can't seem to make sense of it.
 
@cn17 Not an MNC but Comparing it further with Bajaj Finance and its major shareholder Bajaj Finserv. BAJFINANCE has MCap of over 2L crore whole Bajaj Finserve has just over 1L crore.

Valuation depends on many other factors like how much potential market share is there. Maybe Pakistan's HUL has reached saturation point and Indian population has more scope left.
 
@bontogo Yes possible but my contention is emerging markets countries should have very similiar factors going for them, and a very huge premium across emerging markets is a bit of anomaly.
 
@cn17 New to finance, your analysis to me is very intriguing and thought provoking, would love to see more of these.

Can you explain what you mean when you said : "any return is more likely to come from top and bottom line expansion". Do you mean expansion into new product lines and new acquisitions ?

And why is the CAGR different in different currencies? As in "Suzuki Corp. had a 8.8% CAGR return over the past 10 years in JPY and 11.5% CAGR return in INR"?
 
@akiba021 The first part is my personal opinion that there is no room for price to Earnings expansion. For example for every rupee earned you are paying 67.6 to buy HUL, I do not expect that ratio to increase, however I expect the earnings to increase from 1 rupee by around 12 percent CAGR. So if there is no PE derating the stocks returns will come from increased earnings.

The difference in returns is due to currency depreciation of INR over the last 10 years. So returns are a factor of both stock price performance and currency performance (the worse INR has performed against the target currency, the better the returns)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top