First published this on my newsletter Boring Money. Do visit the original link and subscribe if you like read this! I write about finance in India in a way that's fun and enjoyable but doesn't dumb down the subject matter. Finance can be fun!
https://boringmoney.substack.com/p/rbi-cbdc-erupee
--
A quirky aspect of modern financial systems is that it is incredibly difficult to hold cash as cash. Sure, you could withdraw ₹10,000 ($120) and keep it in your wallet. But make that ₹10 crores ($1.2 million) and the only acceptable way to store this cash is in shady suitcases. Possible, yes, but extremely inconvenient.
The way modern financial systems work is that any money you deposit in your bank account is no longer cash but an obligation. From the bank to you. You’re really loaning money to your bank in return for which the bank pays you some interest. Your bank then uses your deposits to make loans to its customers and gets some interest from them. There is obviously a risk here, even if small. If the bank’s customers don’t pay back, your deposits could be at risk. Your bank could go bust. It’s the regulator’s, the RBI’s, job to ensure this doesn’t happen. And if it does happen, to figure a workaround—but it could definitely happen1
Which is why, in theory, money as deposits in your bank differs from cash in your hand. Physical cash is also an obligation—but from the RBI to you. Even if all banks went bust, RBI’s promise to you would still stand and you can get your money’s worth2.
All of this is fascinating but also pointless in any well-functioning financial system. Scheduled banks in India aren’t going bust overnight. And when they’ve done, the RBI has handled the situation reasonably well and customers haven’t lost money. For all practical purposes, having that digit show up in your bank account is as good as holding physical cash in your hand. Just a lot more convenient!
If you’ve kept up with the news the last month and half, you’d know that the RBI is now piloting ways to store cash digitally. It calls this the eRupee or e₹, a digital form of the rupee itself. This differs from money in your bank account in the manner that I described above. If you have ₹100 in your bank account and convert it to e₹1003 this is what happens behind the scenes:
“E-rupee is money. UPI is a payment method,”… umm, okay. If I’m waiting in line waiting to buy apple juice, should I care?
Incentives, utility, or neither?
If you’re a bank, what you care about most is getting your customers to deposit money (that is, loan you money). You pay them a small interest and in turn lend out money for a much higher interest rate. That’s your entire business model. Ideally, your customers would just put tons of money and let it sit there untouched.
But that’s far from what customers want from banks—they also want to transfer money around to pay for stuff. Which is fine! If you make it easy and seamless for your customers to make and receive payments, it’s a good thing. Your customers will be moving money across banks but the money will be inside the system. If one of your customer is paying someone from another bank, then there’s another receiving money. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter because it evens out. The money’s in the system!
With the eRupee, that changes. Customers can make payments back-and-forth without banks coming into the picture. This isn’t good for banks—they need those deposits to be in the system!
But also, what’s in it for the customer? If I can buy my apple juice without visiting an ATM… that’s good enough for me?
Something that keeps coming up when the RBI speaks about the benefits of the eRupee is that it will help with financial inclusion. The story goes that holding money digitally is good and convenient. But no matter how hard everyone tries a large chunk of India’s population wants little to do with banks and continues using cash.
It’s hard to imagine a scenario where people who’ve been averse to bank accounts suddenly decide to lose their inhibition to technology and financial systems because… the money in your bank account is a debt obligation while the eRupee comes directly from the RBI. People who like cash like it because it’s not digital. Cash is nice to touch, feel, and hold. You can stash it in your wallet or inside your mattress, if that’s your thing. It’s not a number on your screen that can disappear with an accidental press of a button.
Of course, others like cash not because it’s nice to hold but because it’s difficult to trace4. I don’t even mean like terrorists and stuff. Small businesses love cash because it lets them get away from paying tax. Would the eRupee allow people to commit tax fraud? I feel that this is an important use-case that the RBI needs to replicate with the eRupee if it wants adoption. “Commit tax fraud, just do it digitally!” sounds like a good pitch5.
If you liked reading this do visit the original link and subscribe! https://boringmoney.substack.com/p/rbi-cbdc-erupee
https://boringmoney.substack.com/p/rbi-cbdc-erupee
--
A quirky aspect of modern financial systems is that it is incredibly difficult to hold cash as cash. Sure, you could withdraw ₹10,000 ($120) and keep it in your wallet. But make that ₹10 crores ($1.2 million) and the only acceptable way to store this cash is in shady suitcases. Possible, yes, but extremely inconvenient.
The way modern financial systems work is that any money you deposit in your bank account is no longer cash but an obligation. From the bank to you. You’re really loaning money to your bank in return for which the bank pays you some interest. Your bank then uses your deposits to make loans to its customers and gets some interest from them. There is obviously a risk here, even if small. If the bank’s customers don’t pay back, your deposits could be at risk. Your bank could go bust. It’s the regulator’s, the RBI’s, job to ensure this doesn’t happen. And if it does happen, to figure a workaround—but it could definitely happen1
Which is why, in theory, money as deposits in your bank differs from cash in your hand. Physical cash is also an obligation—but from the RBI to you. Even if all banks went bust, RBI’s promise to you would still stand and you can get your money’s worth2.
All of this is fascinating but also pointless in any well-functioning financial system. Scheduled banks in India aren’t going bust overnight. And when they’ve done, the RBI has handled the situation reasonably well and customers haven’t lost money. For all practical purposes, having that digit show up in your bank account is as good as holding physical cash in your hand. Just a lot more convenient!
If you’ve kept up with the news the last month and half, you’d know that the RBI is now piloting ways to store cash digitally. It calls this the eRupee or e₹, a digital form of the rupee itself. This differs from money in your bank account in the manner that I described above. If you have ₹100 in your bank account and convert it to e₹1003 this is what happens behind the scenes:
- Your bank opens its ledger and deletes its debt obligation to you (deposits are loans from you to the bank!)
- The bank digs out its stash of eRupees that it’s stored on a hard disk somewhere. The RBI has given the bank “eRupees” just as it gives the bank physical rupees
- Bank hands over the eRupees to you in your e-wallet! Just like it does with cash. The bank has nothing to do with your money now and your relationship is directly with the RBI, who has “printed” these eRupees
“E-rupee is money. UPI is a payment method,”… umm, okay. If I’m waiting in line waiting to buy apple juice, should I care?
Incentives, utility, or neither?
If you’re a bank, what you care about most is getting your customers to deposit money (that is, loan you money). You pay them a small interest and in turn lend out money for a much higher interest rate. That’s your entire business model. Ideally, your customers would just put tons of money and let it sit there untouched.
But that’s far from what customers want from banks—they also want to transfer money around to pay for stuff. Which is fine! If you make it easy and seamless for your customers to make and receive payments, it’s a good thing. Your customers will be moving money across banks but the money will be inside the system. If one of your customer is paying someone from another bank, then there’s another receiving money. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter because it evens out. The money’s in the system!
With the eRupee, that changes. Customers can make payments back-and-forth without banks coming into the picture. This isn’t good for banks—they need those deposits to be in the system!
But also, what’s in it for the customer? If I can buy my apple juice without visiting an ATM… that’s good enough for me?
Something that keeps coming up when the RBI speaks about the benefits of the eRupee is that it will help with financial inclusion. The story goes that holding money digitally is good and convenient. But no matter how hard everyone tries a large chunk of India’s population wants little to do with banks and continues using cash.
It’s hard to imagine a scenario where people who’ve been averse to bank accounts suddenly decide to lose their inhibition to technology and financial systems because… the money in your bank account is a debt obligation while the eRupee comes directly from the RBI. People who like cash like it because it’s not digital. Cash is nice to touch, feel, and hold. You can stash it in your wallet or inside your mattress, if that’s your thing. It’s not a number on your screen that can disappear with an accidental press of a button.
Of course, others like cash not because it’s nice to hold but because it’s difficult to trace4. I don’t even mean like terrorists and stuff. Small businesses love cash because it lets them get away from paying tax. Would the eRupee allow people to commit tax fraud? I feel that this is an important use-case that the RBI needs to replicate with the eRupee if it wants adoption. “Commit tax fraud, just do it digitally!” sounds like a good pitch5.
If you liked reading this do visit the original link and subscribe! https://boringmoney.substack.com/p/rbi-cbdc-erupee
