Military Personal Finance Flowchart

@abidingpatri0t For the folks stationed in very high cost of living areas it would not pay off the family house

In San Diego county there are roughly 50k folks stationed here with houses averaging over 550k

It would be fine for people in most dumpy Air Force and Army base locations
 
@abidingpatri0t Cool, you linked an article that shows spec ops peeps die in combat more often...

*** You're missing the point of life insurance.

Life insurance, whether insuring at SGLI maximums, less than that or another additional policy on top of, isn't bought based on whether or not you think you are going to die or are at greater risk. It's about your income stream and what (more importantly WHO) that stream provides for.

When young, you have very few things negatively effected if you would die. No wife, no mortgage, no kid's college.

You could be a young seal or young yeoman it doesn't matter. You don't need much life insurance. If any!

Now older you, with the wife, with kids, with the house, with college... you need that life insurance to cover those expenses if you die.
 
@lilfoxkit If that's your plan, great! I'm creating this graphic for young servicemembers. In general, SGLI is enough. They don't need to seek out additional life insurance. This is where many young servicemembers fall into whole life insurance traps and other financial products that are less than suitable for their situation.

Perhaps when they get married or have children they can reevaluate, but for starting now, SGLI should be enough in >90% of cases.
 
@lilfoxkit I think insurance is about risk mitigation. Someone with a higher likelihood of dying should probably have more insurance. Similar to car insurance, you set your policy based on the amount of risk you want to mitigate. If I feel like I'm in a safe job, then less insurance payout means less of a premium I have to pay. If I risked dying every time I was deployed, yeah maybe I'd rather pay a higher premium.
 
@abidingpatri0t I've seen a lot situations where it's advisable for people to have more than $400k. I'm at lunch and can't post much now, but I'm also in the camp that term policies should be looked at for anyone that isn't unmarried and childfree. Not always necessary, but should be considered.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top