It's ridiculous that some people consider economics a "science"

@supercow You're looking at the wrong bit of the RBA website for the research.

https://www.rba.gov.au/research/

Minutes are a comms strategy.

Can't resist. Abstract from the first link on the research page:

We consider structural vector autoregressions subject to narrative restrictions, which are inequalities involving structural shocks in specific time periods (e.g. shock signs in given quarters). Narrative restrictions are used widely in the empirical literature. However, under these restrictions, there are no formal results on identification or the properties of frequentist approaches to inference, and existing Bayesian methods can be sensitive to prior choice. We provide formal results on identification, propose a computationally tractable robust Bayesian method that eliminates prior sensitivity, and show that it is asymptotically valid from a frequentist perspective. Using our method, we find that inferences about the output effects of US monetary policy obtained under restrictions related to the Volcker episode are sensitive to prior choice. Under a richer set of restrictions, there is robust evidence that output falls following a positive monetary policy shock.
 
@supercow Yeah Australia's reserve bank is garbage, other developed countries have a much more transparent system and employ some quantity of qualified experts (e.g. experts in economics / professors etc) as opposed to the 'stake holders' / layman we have here.
 
@supercow OP do you think any decision making legislative or other in this country is made by public servants elected or other using science. Ive got a bridge to sell you.

In addition the phraseology you are seeking is transparency. Australia governments have none. I've been fighting this for about 5 years.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top