padraig2003
New member
@kristhuy Is that true?
For instance, I read here a few times that a WFH holder wouldn't be considered having a 住所. But it's possible to enroll in NHI or rather required in case there is no existing travel insurance.
In other words, I don't see how joining NHI here would make you considered having a 住所 while remaining on travel insurance would not, when the stint in Japan is exactly the same in nature.
Similar for short term (less than a year) exchange students (see this thread), which are also required to join NHI (for stays longer than 3 months).
P.S. Though granted, the user you replied to might IMO have either a 住所 (the center of life hasn't moved to the country they currently do work in) or not be enrolled legally. My comment isn't about them per se.
For instance, I read here a few times that a WFH holder wouldn't be considered having a 住所. But it's possible to enroll in NHI or rather required in case there is no existing travel insurance.
In other words, I don't see how joining NHI here would make you considered having a 住所 while remaining on travel insurance would not, when the stint in Japan is exactly the same in nature.
Similar for short term (less than a year) exchange students (see this thread), which are also required to join NHI (for stays longer than 3 months).
P.S. Though granted, the user you replied to might IMO have either a 住所 (the center of life hasn't moved to the country they currently do work in) or not be enrolled legally. My comment isn't about them per se.