Search results

@brorob Redundancy in his contract requires 2 weeks notice and no specific redundancy compensation - I suspect if the employer knows what they're doing they'll do this when he hands notice in

@alf I think you're making the assumption that he wasn't employed for 12 months, not the case and I'm not sure you've followed my understanding. Thanks though

@angelface2016 That avenue is being explored, and I'm not going to rely on anything I get in response on here. But cheers anyway

@greatfulforjesus Thanks for this, quite comfortable that he is entitled.. perhaps I could have worded it better

@blitzking Yeah that's the conclusion we've arrived at - it's not worth staying at the job on the reduced hours, idea is to give notice and get paid his notice period on current higher hours, get annual leave paid out at ordinary weekly pay (which would be based on higher hours), plus public...

Gidday team, through my job as an accountant I have a basic understanding of certain aspects of employment law, hoping someone can provide clarification on the following: A family member who is employed has basically been told the company employing him needs to reduce his hours significantly...