Search results

@larryzz Thanks!

@larryzz Thanks again for your answer and advice. I'll look into the book and the risks associated with Nasdaq-100. Btw, just a small question regarding justetf: The performance charts they show already include TER, right? It says that on the website but I wanted to make sure.

@larryzz Thank you so much for your detailed answer. From VWCE to SP500 to Nasdaq 100 there is clearly a trend of increasing risk and return. I do understand Nasdaq 100 being more volatile, but looking at their record in the past 10 years it still seems to be growing rapidly and (almost)...

@larryzz Thanks! I'm 26 and plan to invest €600 monthly, which will increase gradually. At the beginning 50% will go to VWCE for stability and the other half I want to go a bit riskier and Nasdaq-100 seems like a good choice for a higher return. I will likely hold onto both long term, only...

@larryzz May I ask why you suggest Invesco and iShares, despite their lower performance? Simply because the other two are too young and small?

Links: iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc AXA IM Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD Acc Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C

@harley It does, so maybe share price doesn't matter that much in this case?

@harley So the smaller ones have TER ~0.2% and share price $35, while the large ones 0.3% and $870. For me there are no trading costs for saving plans so it doesn't make a difference.

@harley Weird. I see four. Maybe it's has to do with your location. iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (Acc) Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc AXA IM Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF USD Acc Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C

I'm looking to track Nadsaq-100 and justetf gives these four options from iShares, Invesco, Xtrackers, and AXA IM. The former two are bigger and have higher TER, but marginally worse performance. The latter two are younger but cheaper (still > 1 Y and > 400 M€). I couldn't find the tracking...